Tags css Disability exam special person. Post a Comment. Previous Post Next Post. Contact Form. LinkList ul li ul'. Tabify by Templateify v1. Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Ask Question. Asked 7 years, 9 months ago. Active 7 years, 9 months ago. Viewed times. I wonder whether line 3 is academic and can be left out. Are there real world users around with no CSS but Javascript? Related posts: Why not noscript tag Avoid flickering. Improve this question. Community Bot 1 1 1 silver badge.
Doesn't quite make sense. This question appears to be off-topic because it is about user experience. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. Not that mobile devices are likely to skew the figures all that much in the developed world, given that they can increasingly run Javascript with no problems!
What the statistic is saying is that 2 in every visits to the site are from a browser with javascript switched off or without javascript. It just sounds like a large percentage to me. I know webcrawler will not be javascript enabled but these are surely discounted from the statistics. I am not that clued up on the mobile market but I imagine the same statement is true there.
Javascript capabilities are much lower in the mobile market. While this is rarer than it used to be, it does still happen in some places. Its really mind boggling. If it were important enough there would be a solution to it, but that thing is its not, sadly. How about all the disabled people you are referring take some action themselves and invest in the development of such a utility.
People whom live with such disabilities are never going to have the same experience as one without, fact. Their recommendations and guidelines not only make it possible for assistive technology to work more effectively but, I believe, following and adhering to the guidelines lead to much better design. A lot of people, and it seems to be becoming increasing true, design their sites with an expectation that javascript will be enabled and if this is not the case the large parts of the functionality is not available or behaviour is erratic.
Maybe the answer is to switch of javascript to get some idea of what it is like for a disabled person to use the web. So that would be a good demo exercise about what happens when you poorly implement JS.
I surf without JS enabled the majority of the time and do have a disability. Do you think this is a strategy switching of javascript followed by other people with disabilities?
It is my choice plus there are my bandwidth issues as one small factor. I agree that reasonable adjustments should be made or progressive enhancement techniques applied so the site at least has basic core functionality. By volume on could say the chief internet use of js pop-ups and spam by volume.
0コメント